Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 40
Filtrar
1.
Ann Pharmacother ; 57(9): 1025-1035, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36539949

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Drug-related problems (DRPs) are prevalent and avoidable disease that patients experience due to drug use or nonuse. However, secondary prevention policies have not yet been systematized. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical impact of a secondary prevention bundle for DRPs in patients who visited the emergency department (ED) for medicine-related problems. METHODS: A single-center randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 28, 2019, to January 28, 2021, with 1-month follow-up. We included 769 adult patients who visited ED with a DRP associated with cardiovascular, alimentary tract, and metabolic system medications. For the intervention group, a DRP prevention bundle, consisting of a combined strategy initiated in the ED was applied. Patients in the control group received standard pharmaceutical care. Intervention was evaluated in terms of 30-day hospital readmission due to any cause. RESULTS: Final analysis included 769 patients, of which 68 (8.8%) were readmitted within 30 days (control group, 40 of 386 [cumulative incidence: 10.4%]; intervention group, 28 of 383 [cumulative incidence, 7.3%]). After adjustment of the model for chronic heart failure, there was a lower incidence of hospital readmission among patients in the intervention group compared with those in the control group, odds ratio: 0.59 [95% confidence interval: 0.37-0.97]; number needed to treat (NNT) = 32. No significant differences in other outcomes were observed. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: In this clinical trial, DRP prevention bundle in adjusted analysis decreased the rate of 30-day hospital readmission for any cause in patients who visited ED for a DRP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03607097).


Asunto(s)
Alta del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente , Adulto , Humanos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital
2.
Eur J Hosp Pharm ; 29(5): 271-274, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33293283

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency of emergency department (ED) revisits among elderly patients with gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to anticoagulant treatment and identify factors associated with an increased risk of ED revisits. METHODS: A 3-year retrospective observational study was designed, including elderly patients (≥65 years) with atrial fibrillation and undergoing oral anticoagulation therapy who visited the ED for gastrointestinal bleeding. To evaluate the risk factors for 30-day revisit, a multivariate analysis was designed including comorbidities, concomitant treatment, change in anticoagulant treatment and prescription of direct-acting oral anticoagulants. RESULTS: 80 patients were included. At discharge, anticoagulation therapy was modified in 21 (26.2%) patients; and changed from an oral anticoagulant to heparin in 17 (21.2%) patients and to another oral anticoagulant in 4 (5.0%) patients. Anticoagulant treatment was withdrawn in 5 (6.3%) patients at discharge. Eleven (13.7%) patients revisited the ED 30 days after hospital discharge for bleeding episodes. No differences in the frequency of revisit to the ED were observed in the patients who changed their anticoagulant treatment at discharge. In the multivariate analysis, chronic kidney disease was the only factor significantly associated with revisits at 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients who experience a first episode of gastrointestinal bleeding have a high risk of revisiting the ED for a bleeding episode, with no particular differences between the types of anticoagulant prescribed at discharge.


Asunto(s)
Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/inducido químicamente
3.
Clin Investig Arterioscler ; 33 Suppl 2: 7-13, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34006358

RESUMEN

Based on the most recent scientific evidence, in this chapter we describe the relation of levels of triglycerides and risk of cardiovascular diseases. Particularly, we describe the prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia based on studies published at national and international reports; the relation between hypertriglyceridemia and cardiovascular diseases according to results of cohort studies; and finally, we describe the most recent evidence from clinical trials, meta-analysis and systematic reviews that have shown data on the efficacy of lowering triglyceride levels and reducing cardiovascular diseases.


Asunto(s)
Hipertrigliceridemia , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Humanos , Hiperlipidemias , Hipertrigliceridemia/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Triglicéridos
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33807285

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The concept of global cardiovascular risk is not usually well understood by patients in consultation. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open clinical trial of one-year duration to evaluate the effectiveness in reducing global cardiovascular risk with an intervention aimed at high-risk patients to improve information on the cardiovascular risk compared to the usual care. The intervention was focused on providing information about cardiovascular risk in a more understandable way, explaining the best practices to reduce cardiovascular risk, and tailoring information to the individual. RESULTS: Four-hundred and sixty-four subjects participated in the study; 59.3% were men, and the mean age was 61.0 (SD 8.0) years. Significant reductions in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (-3.12 mmHg), body mass index (BMI) (-0.34 kg/m2), abdominal circumference (-1.24 cm), and REGICOR cardiovascular risk (-0.63) were observed in the intervention group. Overall, no differences in cardiovascular risk score were observed between groups at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Providing an easy-to-understand assessment of the cardiovascular risk motivated high-risk patients to adopt a healthier lifestyle and improved cardiovascular risk after one year in the intervention group. Clinicians should assess a patient's baseline understanding of their CV risk using tools other than absolute risk before making treatment recommendations.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Presión Sanguínea , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Femenino , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
5.
Fam Pract ; 38(2): 154-159, 2021 03 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32914857

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of information about patients with mild or moderate symptoms during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This is especially true for those who attended and were followed up at primary care settings. OBJECTIVES: We aim to measure the seroprevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a community sample of possible cases and among probable cases followed in primary care. METHODS: We selected a random sample of 600 individuals stratified by age groups from a total population of 19 899 individuals from a community area in Barcelona. We also invited all the patients that had been followed by General Practitioners (GPs). For both populations, we used COVID-19 rapid lateral flow immunoassays, which qualitatively assess the presence of patient-generated Immunoglobulins G (IgG) and Immunoglobulin M (IgM). RESULTS: Three hundred and eleven asymptomatic individuals from the randomly selected sample participated in the study. The mean age was 43.7 years [standard deviation (SD) = 21.79] and 55% were women. Seventeen individuals were seropositive for IgM and/or IgG, resulting in an overall prevalence of 5.47% (95% confidence interval = 3.44-8.58). Six hundred and thirty-four symptomatic patients were followed up by GPs. The mean age was 46.97 years (SD = 20.05) and 57.73% were women. Of these, 244 patients (38.49%) were seropositive. Results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the odds ratio for a positive test was significantly increased in patients who had fever, ageusia and contact with a patient diagnosed with COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: The seroprevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among possible cases was lower than expected. Approximately, 40% of the symptomatic patients followed up by GPs during the peak months of the pandemic were positive.


Asunto(s)
Prueba Serológica para COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Atención Primaria de Salud , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , España/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
6.
Clin Immunol ; 223: 108631, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33189888

RESUMEN

Although the starting event in COVID-19 is a viral infection some patients present with an over-exuberant inflammatory response, leading to acute lung injury (ALI) and adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Since IL-6 plays a critical role in the inflammatory response, we assessed the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) in this single-centre, observational study in all Covid-19 in-patient with a proven SARS-CoV-2 rapidly progressing infection to prevent ALI and ARDS. 104 patients with COVID-19 treated with TCZ had a lower mortality rate (5·8%) compared with the regional mortality rate (11%), hospitalized patient's mortality (10%), and slightly lower than hospitalized patients treated with our standard of care alone (6%). We found that TCZ rapidly decreased acute phase reactants, ferritin and liver release of proteins. D-Dimer decreased slowly. We did not observe specific safety concerns. Early administration of IL6-R antagonists in COVID-19 patients with impending hyperinflammatory response, may be safe and effective treatment to prevent, ICU admission and further complications.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Pulmonar Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/tratamiento farmacológico , Inflamación/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/tratamiento farmacológico , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Lesión Pulmonar Aguda/mortalidad , Anciano , COVID-19/mortalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/mortalidad , Femenino , Ferritinas/metabolismo , Productos de Degradación de Fibrina-Fibrinógeno/metabolismo , Humanos , Inflamación/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Receptores de Interleucina-6/inmunología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidad , Análisis de Supervivencia
7.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 45(5): 1149-1152, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32515839

RESUMEN

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Since 2011, a collaborative territorial network for urgent care has been deployed in Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau area, which allows direct and early transfer of patients with frailty from the hospital emergency department (ED) to other healthcare settings according to the destination's adequacy. This study aimed to identify factors associated with inappropriate intravenous antibiotic treatment prescribed on referral of patients with frailty based on microbiological culture and analyse the effect of inappropriate prescription on ED reconsultations for any cause 30 days after hospital discharge. METHODS: This observational, retrospective study was performed at a tertiary hospital between March 2018 and February 2019 and included 264 patients. A multivariate analysis, including variables with a P-value <.2 in the previous univariate analysis, was conducted. The variables included in the analysis were age, sex, patient comorbidities (COPD, diabetes and chronic kidney disease), antibiotic treatment in the last 30 days and patient referral (nursing home or family home). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Multidrug-resistant bacteria were isolated from 85 patients (51.5% of the isolates). In total, 159 patients received carbapenem, of whom 87 (54.7%) had non-drug-resistant bacteria. The antibiotic was considered inappropriate in 33 patients (12.5%) according to an antibiogram. Only 71 (26.8%) patients had a definitive culture on discharge. Moreover, 73 (28.3%) patients were readmitted after 30 days. Patients with an inappropriate antibiotic treatment had more reconsultations within 30 days than those with adequate treatment (59.3% vs 24.5%; P < .001). In a multivariate analysis, an inappropriate prescription was significantly associated with a higher number of reconsultations at 30 days (OR, 3.22 [1.37-7.57]). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: In patients discharged from the ED with intravenous antibiotics, the empirical prescription of an inappropriate drug according to the final culture is a frequent problem and is related to a higher number of reconsultations. This highlights the need to implement early communication strategies with outpatient units to optimize antibiotic therapy once microbiological results are known.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración Intravenosa , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Alta del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria
8.
Emergencias (Sant Vicenç dels Horts) ; 32(2): 90-96, abr. 2020. graf, tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-188156

RESUMEN

Objetivo: Describir las principales características de todos los servicios de emergencias prehospitalarios (SEPH) existentes en Cataluña. Método: Una encuestadora profesional entrevistó a los responsables clínicos de todos los SEPH de Cataluña. La encuesta fue preparada por los autores, y abordaba diversos aspectos organizativos, profesionales, laborales, formativos, docentes y de investigación. Las preguntas contenidas en la encuesta solo permitían respuestas cerradas, y hacían referencia a la situación en 2015. Resultados: Se identificaron 13 SEPH (11 públicos, 2 privados), que recibieron 2.482.627 consultas (16,4% a SEPH privados) y realizaron 943.849 atenciones (11,8% por SEPH privados). Había 336 bases de soporte vital básico y 73 de avanzado, con instalaciones mayoritariamente consideradas de tamaño suficiente y calidad buena. Se contrataron 1.374.845 horas anuales (753.995 de médico y 620.850 de enfermero), el 23,4% de ellas por SEPH privados, que globalmente corresponderían a 815 puestos de trabajo a jornada completa (447 de médico, 368 de enfermero). La dotación de médicos/enfermeros era relativamente estable durante el día, pero decaía un 31%/9% de madrugada. La especialidad médica mayoritaria era medicina familiar y comunitaria (56,8%), el 21,3% no tenía formación especializada, y el 6,5% tenía título de doctor. Había médicos/enfermeros profesores universitarios de grado en el 61,5%/46,2% de los SEPH; y de postgrado en el 46,2%/84,6%. Recibían estudiantes de medicina/enfermería en prácticas de grado el 15,4%/15,4% de los SEPH, y de postgrado el 69,2%/76,9%. Conclusiones: La actividad de los SEPH en Cataluña es elevada; un 12% la desarrollan SEPH privados, y globalmente implica a un número alto de médicos y enfermeros, los cuales además desarrollan un rol docente y, en menor medida, investigador


Objective: To describe the main characteristics of all prehospital emergency services (SEPHs, the Catalan acronym) in Catalonia (the SEPHCAT study). Methods: A professional survey researcher interviewed the medical directors of all services in Catalonia, using a questionnaire prepared by the authors. Questions covered aspects related to organization, professional staffing and employment conditions, as well as the staff’s training, instructional activity and research. Only closed answers were collected. The survey reflected the situation in 2015. Results: We identified 13 SEPHs (11 in the public health service and 2 private companies). Together they received 2 482 627 calls (16.4% to private services) and attended 943 849 emergencies (11.8% attended by private companies). Three hundred thirty-six basic life support units and 73 advanced life support units were reported. They were mostly considered to be of sufficient size and quality. The SEPHs contracted 1 374 845 person-hours/y (753 995 physician-hours and 620 850 nurse-hours; 23.4% in private companies). These figures correspond to 815 full-time staff positions (447 for physicians and 368 for nurses). The numbers of physicians and nurses working were relatively stable during the morning, afternoon and evening shifts but decreased during the midnight-to-early-morning shift (physicians, by 31%; nurses, by 9%). A majority of the physicians employed were trained in family and community medicine (56.8%), but 21.3% had no specialized training; 6.5% had PhD degrees. SEPH physicians (61.5%) and nurses (46.2%) also taught undergraduate medical students; 46.2% of physicians and 84.6% of nurses taught postgraduate medical courses. Both undergraduate medical and nursing students were received in the same measure for practical training by 15.4% of the SEPHs; 69.2% also offered practical training for physicians at the postgraduate level and 76.9% trained postgraduate nurses. Conclusions: SEPHs in Catalonia are very active, and private companies account for nearly 12% of the activity. Together the public and private sectors employ a large number of physicians and nurses. Staff members are involved in training others but are less involved in research


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Prehospitalaria/clasificación , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Prehospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , 16360 , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración
9.
Emergencias ; 32(2): 90-96, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32125107

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe the main characteristics of all prehospital emergency services (SEPHs, the Catalan acronym) in Catalonia (the SEPHCAT study). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A professional survey researcher interviewed the medical directors of all services in Catalonia, using a questionnaire prepared by the authors. Questions covered aspects related to organization, professional staffing and employment conditions, as well as the staff's training, instructional activity and research. Only closed answers were collected. The survey reflected the situation in 2015. RESULTS: We identified 13 SEPHs (11 in the public health service and 2 private companies). Together they received 2 482 627 calls (16.4% to private services) and attended 943 849 emergencies (11.8% attended by private companies). Three hundred thirty-six basic life support units and 73 advanced life support units were reported. They were mostly considered to be of sufficient size and quality. The SEPHs contracted 1374845 person-hours/y (753995 physician-hours and 620 850 nurse-hours; 23.4% in private companies). These figures correspond to 815 full-time staff positions (447 for physicians and 368 for nurses). The numbers of physicians and nurses working were relatively stable during the morning, afternoon and evening shifts but decreased during the midnight-to-early-morning shift (physicians, by 31%; nurses, by 9%). A majority of the physicians employed were trained in family and community medicine (56.8%), but 21.3% had no specialized training; 6.5% had PhD degrees. SEPH physicians (61.5%) and nurses (46.2%) also taught undergraduate medical students; 46.2% of physicians and 84.6% of nurses taught postgraduate medical courses. Both undergraduate medical and nursing students were received in the same measure for practical training by 15.4% of the SEPHs; 69.2% also offered practical training for physicians at the postgraduate level and 76.9% trained postgraduate nurses. CONCLUSION: SEPHs in Catalonia are very active, and private companies account for nearly 12% of the activity. Together the public and private sectors employ a large number of physicians and nurses. Staff members are involved in training others but are less involved in research.


OBJETIVO: Describir las principales características de todos los servicios de emergencias prehospitalarios (SEPH) existentes en Cataluña. METODO: Una encuestadora profesional entrevistó a los responsables clínicos de todos los SEPH de Cataluña. La encuesta fue preparada por los autores, y abordaba diversos aspectos organizativos, profesionales, laborales, formativos, docentes y de investigación. Las preguntas contenidas en la encuesta solo permitían respuestas cerradas, y hacían referencia a la situación en 2015. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 13 SEPH (11 públicos, 2 privados), que recibieron 2.482.627 consultas (16,4% a SEPH privados) y realizaron 943.849 atenciones (11,8% por SEPH privados). Había 336 bases de soporte vital básico y 73 de avanzado, con instalaciones mayoritariamente consideradas de tamaño suficiente y calidad buena. Se contrataron 1.374.845 horas anuales (753.995 de médico y 620.850 de enfermero), el 23,4% de ellas por SEPH privados, que globalmente corresponderían a 815 puestos de trabajo a jornada completa (447 de médico, 368 de enfermero). La dotación de médicos/enfermeros era relativamente estable durante el día, pero decaía un 31%/9% de madrugada. La especialidad médica mayoritaria era medicina familiar y comunitaria (56,8%), el 21,3% no tenía formación especializada, y el 6,5% tenía título de doctor. Había médicos/enfermeros profesores universitarios de grado en el 61,5%/46,2% de los SEPH; y de postgrado en el 46,2%/84,6%. Recibían estudiantes de medicina/enfermería en prácticas de grado el 15,4%/15,4% de los SEPH, y de postgrado el 69,2%/76,9%. CONCLUSIONES: La actividad de los SEPH en Cataluña es elevada; un 12% la desarrollan SEPH privados, y globalmente implica a un número alto de médicos y enfermeros, los cuales además desarrollan un rol docente y, en menor medida, investigador.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Urgencias Médicas , Humanos , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Médicos , España , Recursos Humanos
10.
Rev. esp. cardiol. (Ed. impr.) ; 72(7): 562-568, jul. 2019. tab, graf
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-188553

RESUMEN

Introducción y objetivos: Desarrollar una función predictiva del riesgo cardiovascular de por vida de eventos cardiovasculares, mortales y no mortales en población laboral española. Métodos: Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo. Se seleccionó a trabajadores de entre 18 y 65 años sin antecedentes de enfermedad cardiovascular que realizaron un examen de salud entre los años 2004 y 2007. El 70% de la cohorte se utilizó para desarrollar la ecuación de riesgo y el 30%, para validar la ecuación. Se construyeron 4 modelos de riesgos proporcionales de Cox en los que se utilizaron como variables dependientes la aparición de eventos cardiovasculares y la aparición de eventos competitivos; se usaron los mismos modelos en varones y mujeres. Los eventos mortales y no mortales se evaluaron hasta el año 2014. Resultados: Se incluyó a 762.054 sujetos, con una media de edad de 35,48 años (el 71,14% varones). Resultaron factores significativos en el modelo la ocupación manual, el tabaquismo, la diabetes mellitus, el tratamiento antihipertensivo, la presión arterial sistólica, el colesterol total, el colesterol unido a lipoproteínas de alta densidad y el tratamiento hipolipemiante; en varones, el consumo de alcohol, el índice de masa corporal, los antecedentes de enfermedad coronaria precoz en familiares de primer grado, la enfermedad renal y la presión arterial diastólica. El área bajo la curva c fue 0,84 (IC95%, 0,82-0,85) en varones y 0,73 (IC95%, 0,66-0,80) en mujeres. La calibración mostró una subestimación en los deciles de bajo riesgo y sobrestimación en los de alto riesgo. Conclusiones: El modelo de riesgo cardiovascular de por vida tiene una discriminación y una calibración satisfactorias, con mejores resultados para varones que para mujeres


Introduction and objectives: To develop a predictive function of lifetime cardiovascular risk, including morbidity and mortality, in a healthy working population in Spain. Methods: Retrospective cohort study. We selected healthy workers, aged 18 to 65 years, with no history of cardiovascular disease, who underwent a health assessment between 2004 and 2007. We used 70% of the cohort to develop the risk equation, and the remaining 30% to validate the equation. Four Cox proportional hazards models were constructed using cardiovascular events and competing events as dependent variables. The same models were replicated for men and women separately. Fatal and nonfatal events were assessed until 2014. Results: A total of 762 054 individuals were selected. The mean age was 35.48 years and 71.14% were men. Significant risk variables in the model included manual occupations, being a smoker or exsmoker, diabetes mellitus, antihypertensive treatment, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and lipid-lowering treatment; in men, the model also included alcohol consumption, body mass index, a family history of early coronary disease in first-degree relatives, renal failure, and diastolic blood pressure. The area under the curve receiver operating characteristic was 0.84 (95%CI, 0.82-0.85) in men and 0.73 (95%CI, 0.66-0.80) in women. Calibration showed underestimation in low-risk deciles and overestimation in high-risk deciles. Conclusions: The new lifetime cardiovascular risk model has satisfactory discrimination and calibration, with better results in men than in women


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Ajuste de Riesgo/métodos , Arteriosclerosis/epidemiología , Prevención Primaria/métodos , Predicción/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades/clasificación
12.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) ; 72(7): 562-568, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30097396

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To develop a predictive function of lifetime cardiovascular risk, including morbidity and mortality, in a healthy working population in Spain. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. We selected healthy workers, aged 18 to 65 years, with no history of cardiovascular disease, who underwent a health assessment between 2004 and 2007. We used 70% of the cohort to develop the risk equation, and the remaining 30% to validate the equation. Four Cox proportional hazards models were constructed using cardiovascular events and competing events as dependent variables. The same models were replicated for men and women separately. Fatal and nonfatal events were assessed until 2014. RESULTS: A total of 762 054 individuals were selected. The mean age was 35.48 years and 71.14% were men. Significant risk variables in the model included manual occupations, being a smoker or exsmoker, diabetes mellitus, antihypertensive treatment, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and lipid-lowering treatment; in men, the model also included alcohol consumption, body mass index, a family history of early coronary disease in first-degree relatives, renal failure, and diastolic blood pressure. The area under the curve receiver operating characteristic was 0.84 (95%CI, 0.82-0.85) in men and 0.73 (95%CI, 0.66-0.80) in women. Calibration showed underestimation in low-risk deciles and overestimation in high-risk deciles. CONCLUSIONS: The new lifetime cardiovascular risk model has satisfactory discrimination and calibration, with better results in men than in women.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Predicción , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Prevención Primaria/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad/tendencias , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , España/epidemiología , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Adulto Joven
13.
Phytopathology ; 108(2): 223-233, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28945144

RESUMEN

Brown spot of pear, caused by the fungus Stemphylium vesicarium, is an emerging disease of economic importance in several pear-growing areas in Europe. In recent years, new control strategies combining sanitation practices and fungicide applications according to developed forecasting models have been introduced to manage the disease. However, the pathogenic and saprophytic behavior of this pathogen makes it difficult to manage the disease. In addition, climate change can also result in variations in the severity and geographical distribution of the disease. In this study, ecological and epidemiological aspects of brown spot of pear disease related to inoculum characterization and climate change impact were elucidated. The pathogenic variation in S. vesicarium populations from pear orchards and its relationship to inoculum sources (air samples, leaf debris, and infected host and nonhost tissues) was determined using multivariate analysis. In total, six variables related to infection and disease development on cultivar Conference pear detached leaves of 110 S. vesicarium isolates were analyzed. A high proportion of isolates (42%) were nonpathogenic to pear; 85% of these nonpathogenic isolates were recovered from air samples. Most isolates recovered from lesions (93%) and pseudothecia (83%) were pathogenic to pear. A group of pathogenic isolates rapidly infected cultivar Conference pear leaves resulted in disease increase that followed a monomolecular model, whereas some S. vesicarium isolates required a period of time after inoculation to initiate infection and resulted in disease increase that followed a logistic model. The latter group was mainly composed of isolates recovered from pseudothecia on leaf debris, whereas the former group was mainly composed of isolates recovered from lesions on pear fruit and leaves. The relationship between the source of inoculum and pathogenic/aggressiveness profile was confirmed by principal component analysis. The effect of climate change on disease risk was analyzed in two pear-growing areas of Spain under two scenarios (A2 and B1) and for three periods (2005 to 2009, 2041 to 2060, and 2081 to 2100). Simulations showed that the level of risk predicted by BSPcast model increased to high or very high under the two scenarios and was differentially distributed in the two regions. This study is an example of how epidemiological models can be used to predict not only the onset of infections but also how climate change could affect brown spot of pear. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license .


Asunto(s)
Ascomicetos/aislamiento & purificación , Enfermedades de las Plantas/microbiología , Pyrus/microbiología , Ascomicetos/patogenicidad , Ascomicetos/fisiología , Cambio Climático , Frutas/microbiología , Fungicidas Industriales , Geografía , Análisis Multivariante , Hojas de la Planta/microbiología , Riesgo , España
14.
Eur J Hosp Pharm ; 25(5): 274-280, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31157039

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The resolution of potential drug-related problems is a priority of pharmaceutical care programmes. OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical impact on drug-related negative outcomes of a pharmaceutical care programme focusing on the resolution of potential drug-related problems, initiated in the emergency department for patients with heart failure (HF) and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: Controlled trials, in which older adults (≥65 years) receiving four or more medications admitted to the emergency department for ≥12 hours for worsening of HF and/or COPD were randomised (1:1) to either a pharmaceutical care programme focusing on resolving potential drug-related problems initiated at the emergency department (intervention group (IG)) or standard care (control group). Comparisons between the groups were made for the proportion of patients with drug-related negative outcomes, number of drug-related negative outcomes per patient, mean stay, patients readmitted within 180 days and 180-day mortality. RESULTS: 118 patients were included, 59 in each group. Fewer patients in the IG had drug-related negative outcomes (37 (62.7%) vs 47 (79.7%) in the control group (p=0.042)). Fewer drug-related negative outcomes per patient occurred in the IG (56 (0.95 per patient) vs 85 (1.44 per patient) in the control group (p=0.01)). The mean stay was similar between groups (194.7 hours in the IG vs 242.5 hours in the control group (p=0.186)). No difference in revisits within 180 days was found (32 (54.24%) in the IG vs 22 (37.3%) in the control group (p=0.065)). 180-Day mortality was detected in 11 (18.6%) patients in the IG compared with 13 (22%) in the control group (p=0.647). CONCLUSION: A pharmaceutical care programme focusing on resolving potential drug-related problems initiated at the emergency department has a favourable clinical impact, as it reduces the number and prevalence of drug-related negative outcomes. No difference was found in other outcome variables.Trial registration number NCT02368548.

15.
Rev. esp. quimioter ; 30(6): 397-406, dic. 2017. ilus, tab
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-169392

RESUMEN

Given the growing incidence of invasive candidiasis in critically ill and haemato-oncological patients and its poor outcomes, an early diagnosis and treatment are need for get a better prognosis. This document reviews the current approaches that help in diagnosis of invasive candidiasis based on culture-independent microbiological tests. The combination of clinical prediction scores with fungal serological markers could facilitate the approach in antifungal therapy, optimizing it. This article also reviews the epidemiology and primary risk factors for invasive candidiasis in these patients, updating the therapeutic approach algorithms in both clinical contexts based on the main evidence and international guidelines (AU)


Dada la creciente incidencia de candidiasis invasiva en pacientes críticos y hematooncológicos y sus malos resultados, es necesario un diagnóstico y tratamiento precoz para obtener un mejor pronóstico. Este documento revisa los enfoques actuales que ayudan en el diagnóstico de candidiasis invasiva basado en pruebas microbiológicas independientes del cultivo. La combinación de puntuaciones de predicción clínica con marcadores serológicos fúngicos podría facilitar el enfoque en la terapia antifúngica, optimizándola. Este artículo también revisa la epidemiología y los principales factores de riesgo de candidiasis invasiva en estos pacientes, actualizando los algoritmos de abordaje terapéutico en ambos contextos clínicos basados en la evidencia publicada y en las guías internacionales (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Candidiasis Invasiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Candida/patogenicidad , Neutropenia/complicaciones , Algoritmos , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Candidiasis Invasiva/microbiología
17.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 147(9): 381-386, nov. 2016. graf, tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-157026

RESUMEN

Antecedentes y objetivo: Una de las limitaciones del SCORE es que no permite calcular el riesgo en mayores de 65 años. Recientemente, los investigadores del SCORE han publicado unas tablas específicas para mayores (SCORE Older Persons [SCORE OP]). El objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar el impacto de la utilización de las tablas SCORE OP en una población española de pacientes mayores de 64 años y su comparación con las tablas SCORE en el grupo entre 65 y 69 años. Pacientes y método: Estudio transversal realizado en 2 centros de salud urbanos. Se seleccionaron individuos de entre 65 y 85 años sin antecedentes de diabetes mellitus o enfermedad cardiovascular. Se calculó el riesgo utilizando las tablas para países de bajo riesgo SCORE y las nuevas OP. Resultados: Se calculó el riesgo cardiovascular a 3.425 pacientes. En el grupo de entre 65-69 años (n = 974, 22,44%) la media de riesgo según el SCORE fue de 4,08, y según el SCORE OP, de 3,83 (p < 0,001). El porcentaje de pacientes de riesgo alto fue de un 25,46% con SCORE y de 22,90% con SCORE OP (p < 0,001). Utilizando el SCORE deberíamos tratar con hipolipidemiantes al 16,43% de los pacientes, mientras que con el SCORE OP deberíamos tratar al 13,45%. Utilizando SCORE OP en pacientes mayores de 69 años deberíamos tratar con hipolipidemiantes al 61,49% de los pacientes. Conclusiones: Las tablas SCORE OP para mayores de 64 años identifican menos pacientes de alto riesgo que las tablas SCORE, lo que implicaría tratar potencialmente menos pacientes de esas edades con hipolipidemiantes (AU)


Background and objective: Estimating cardiovascular risk with SCORE is not recommended in persons over 65 years. SCORE investigators have recently published specific tables for older people (SCORE Older Persons [SCORE OP]). The aim of this study is to assess the impact of using SCORE OP tables on a Spanish population aged over 64 years, and compare it with the use of SCORE in patients aged 65-69 years. Patients and method: Cross-sectional study carried out in 2 urban primary health care centres. Individuals between 65 and 85 years old without diabetes or established cardiovascular diseases were included. Cardiovascular risk using SCORE and the new SCORE OP tables for low risk countries was calculated. Results: Cardiovascular risk was estimated in 3,425 patients. Mean values of the original SCORE and SCORE OP were 4.08 and 3.83, respectively in the group of patients aged 65-69 years old (n = 974, 22.44%) (P < .001). The percentage of patients at high or very high risk was 25.46% and 22.90% with the original SCORE and the SCORE OP, respectively (P < .001). Using the original SCORE, 16.43% of the total patients should potentially be treated with lipid lowering drugs, while using the SCORE OP, 13.45% of the patients aged 65-69 years should potentially be treated. Using SCORE OP in patients older than 69 years, 61.49% patients should potentially be treated with lipid lowering drugs. Conclusions: SCORE OP identifies fewer patients at high or very high risk than the original SCORE, therefore, its utilization would imply treating fewer patients of this age with lipid lowering drugs (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Indicadores de Salud , Factores de Edad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Estudios Transversales , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos
19.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 147(9): 381-386, 2016 11 04.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27575527

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Estimating cardiovascular risk with SCORE is not recommended in persons over 65 years. SCORE investigators have recently published specific tables for older people (SCORE Older Persons [SCORE OP]). The aim of this study is to assess the impact of using SCORE OP tables on a Spanish population aged over 64 years, and compare it with the use of SCORE in patients aged 65-69 years. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Cross-sectional study carried out in 2 urban primary health care centres. Individuals between 65 and 85 years old without diabetes or established cardiovascular diseases were included. Cardiovascular risk using SCORE and the new SCORE OP tables for low risk countries was calculated. RESULTS: Cardiovascular risk was estimated in 3,425 patients. Mean values of the original SCORE and SCORE OP were 4.08 and 3.83, respectively in the group of patients aged 65-69 years old (n=974, 22.44%) (P< .001). The percentage of patients at high or very high risk was 25.46% and 22.90% with the original SCORE and the SCORE OP, respectively (P<.001). Using the original SCORE, 16.43% of the total patients should potentially be treated with lipid lowering drugs, while using the SCORE OP, 13.45% of the patients aged 65-69 years should potentially be treated. Using SCORE OP in patients older than 69 years, 61.49% patients should potentially be treated with lipid lowering drugs. CONCLUSIONS: SCORE OP identifies fewer patients at high or very high risk than the original SCORE, therefore, its utilization would imply treating fewer patients of this age with lipid lowering drugs.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Indicadores de Salud , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Atención Primaria de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...